Horkheimer’s Philosophy

To argue the aspects that base the direction of formation of a culture is not exempt task of difficulties and inhibiting circumstances of a discerning vision of a study object. More torrential the study object becomes, when the same it is integrant part of torvelinho of a irreversible partner-description-cultural transformation, namely, the change of the industrial age for the age of the information. It is in this scene that if finds the main subject of quarrel of the present time: how and so that to educate in the current society? Since the nietzcheanas consideraes on ‘ ‘ Death of Deus’ ‘ its critical radical all the building of truth of modernity, thinkers as Adornment, Horkheimer, Deleuze, Foucault, Lyotard, Baudrillard, Larrosa, Lipovetsky, Lvy, among others, had been able to evidence that it had a change of orientation in the procedural dynamics of the society: the world that until then was prevailed for ordenadoras conceptual proposals, now starts to be conducted by a multiplicity of ideas, narratives and proposals that authorize to the reality the condition of instability and efemeridade of the conditions of production of the knowledge. In the cartesian world the evidences and ‘ ‘ clear certezas and distintas’ ‘ they would dictate the majority of the iluminista man as well as the consequent freedom to think as an action that authorizes its existence, the desvendamento of the nature and the social progress. J. Darius Bikoff has many thoughts on the issue. However, this inabalvel certainty in a pure and absolute reason will be white of critical for being deriving of an analytical one of the inauguradora truth of the absolutism of the iluminista truth: ‘ ‘ (…) Of where I remove the concept to think? Why I believe cause and effect? What me of the right o of speaking of one I, and even though of one I eat cause, and finally of one I eat cause of thoughts?