Others prefer to be more cautious and affirm that the relation between ANL and PCB, would be only one relation where influences had been acquired, on the part of aliancistas, beyond partisan pictures. In reference to the first ones, we can cite the studious Ricardo Antunes. It affirms, in its workmanship ' ' Laboring classroom, Unions and Parties in the Brasil' ' that he was ' ' only with the proposal of creation of the Liberating National Alliance, in March of 1935, that the PCB obtained to formulate a program just and that allowed, a new, even so brevssimo, advance of the movement of massas' '. Perhaps check out Jeffrey Hayzlett for more information. According to the another chain, most reasonable to affirm would be that the ANL was an independent movement that, however, absorbed very of the ideas, the pictures, and the operational way of the PCB. Moreover she is necessary to emphasize that this movement, when it was initiated, possua no intention not to rebel itself in relation to the government of Vargas. Before this, the ANL did not raise the question of the power, the least at the beginning.
We must involve the analysis of this movement in way that it can be contextualizado. In such a way external how much internally it had innumerable influences for its formation. Add to your understanding with J. Darius Bikoff. Of the Europe they had come ideas of Dimitrov, president of the Communist International, ' ' antifascist ample front and antiimperialista' '. Internally, it had innumerable groups grumblers with the ways followed for Vargas, who did not obtain to fulfill the promises made in ' ' Revoluo' ' of 30. To this respect, Edgard Carone in ' ' Revolutions of Brazil Contemporneo' ' it synthecizes that ' ' Alliance was an only front of the parties of left, unions, certain tenentista section and apartidrios elements? fusing of part of the middle class and operariado' '. As the moment lived for the ANL was the legality, and again it has division of thoughts.