How it goes to distinguish and to filter this pile of things? the country ' is this; ' filtro' ' , to take off what it is good of all, or then to transform what it can be bad in a to be prevented example. Is not easy such task, but who said that to educate it is easy? ' is one; ' processo' ' , it is all hour, all day, all week, the life all. , therefore if you not to gain its son, the world earn, the competitor of the street has an enormous advantage. He sees as well as acts the dealing one when he wants to bride. In everything it reveals conceivable, while a father looks for to say not in whom he is harmful, aliciador always shows permicividade, is yes pra everything, money is easy, easy to earn easy to spend, the sex and drugs can, to walk of car to the all, can yes, crack in the street, this also can. As everything is there, it fits to who to clarify that all this easiness of ' ' to have and of ' ' pleasure fcil' ' it can bring consequence harmful itself and the society? as to live and to coexist everything this, to know ' ' ter' ' , looking ' ' ser' ' . ' ' Ter' ' , to usufruct of everything this of comprehensive form, measured and not desmedida, to get with the proper efforts being valued the conquest, to know the material, social and economic value, exactly when a cellular one is gained for example. ' ' Ser' ' correct in the use and the right to use, to observe the value of the things. At last, instead of if saying, in my time it was not thus, it had? if to say, looks at goes to have ' ' things, we go to live ' ' coisas' ' , knowing to use, making the call ' ' good uso' '. The cellular one, knowing to use is a good ally, the computer is an excellent educative tool, when used well, the ballad, the party, everything if can, when, we educate in them to have and to use the things, in case that contrary we become in them vitiated and victims of the proper vice, consequently we pay ' ' caro' ' , we, the family, the society and the world where we live.
If breast-feeding conciliated love and suppression of the hunger, in the adolescence this already does not occur and two distinct necessities if they restore in the citizen. The anorxico behavior normally appears when it has offers of food, as well as of other objects, but it lacks the affection, that before was offered of form conjugated with the food. It still occurs of being offered affection, but with roupagem of object, as if the demand for affection was a objetal relation. For the anorxica, to refuse the food it means to refuse affective the enlaamento deficit. The hunger exists and many times occur the compulsory ingestion of food, but it is necessary to purge what it did not come of the adequate and desired form.
From there it comes the recurrent conciliation of anorexy with bulimia. Although Freud us has presented diverse concepts that much had helped in them to understand the anorexy, it never it dedicated an exclusive text to the subject, what it came to happen in publications of authors had succeeded who it. The conception of the anorexy from the affective enlaamento between mother and son, as well as the meaning of the feeding in the first relations you object are relatively recent boardings. M. Selvini-Palazzoli (1999) relates the difficulties in the relations objects with corporal experiences of pathological character. According to psychoanalytic, a relation emotionally disturbed mother-son provokes in the body of the son, imperfection, alienation sensations and of it uncontrols. These sensations, when restrained, they promote the ticket to act, by means of anorxicas behaviors. Such assertive ones lead them it the sistmico character of the anorexy, that has, doubtlessly, start half end in the obstacles of the familiar romance. Especially in it would histeria, the symptom is an important form to effect a demand and it has the function to express a question of the citizen, however, is inherent to the histrica to infer the proper answers in order to support the lack of the satisfaction of its desires and, in the anorexy, he is proven that the demand is in the dimension of the desire, dismisses what it of the necessity place.
On the mass of the phenomenon say the figures: according to the Analytical Center of Institute of Social and Political Studies major news channels cause the audience a sense of anxiety in 60%, fear – in 49%, 45% in frustration. What is it but an information war with its own population? Particularly vulnerable in this war are children. For example, a child prone to neurotic reactions to the message about the disaster on television may have more serious psychiatric disorders than those children who have experienced it first hand. No less destructive for the child mind movies are full of aggression and violence. There is evidence of U.S. researchers showing significant correlation between the expression of child cruelty and violence, on the one hand, and number seen on television episodes of violence. Children repeat what they see on screen, easy to imitate and learn aggressive behavior.
Thus, in the words of Albert Bandura, a TV model can be the subject of role models for millions. How to protect against information abuse Fortunately, an end to this endless stream of horror, intrusive and loud advertisements, and endless zubodrobilnyh krovopuskatelnyh serials in our power. You need to sit down on a strict diet information, ie possible to restrict the flow of negative information: abandon viewing programs that cause negative emotions, and reading newspaper articles similar subjects. Those who have managed to maintain sanity and do. If you notice, many actors, directors and other "public entity" in his interview notes that do not read newspapers or watch television.
Well, if you absolutely can not live without news release, register yourself small doses, be content with watching a block of news, do not look similar at one sitting, and other channels. Even better restrict viewing of a news site, possibly the least aggressive. Create your own information field and enrich it with positive information and positive emotions. And especially watch carefully what the transfer watching your children. Up to 7 years in children's consciousness, there is no protective barrier of virtual aggression, only after a 12-year-old children learn to separate the real and virtual reality. So what you have seen in a child – a reality imprinted for life. Try to limit contact between the children with TV, browse and movies themselves before being allowed to view their child. Talk with your child what he saw, let your comments. In short, protect yourself and your children from the destructive effect of negative information, do not let myself plunge into a state of stress and manipulate their own consciousness.